|
that will soften the hearts of a large
timber merchant; but we are not dealers and we don’t have the
storage capacity to buy in for others.
What if a group of furniture makers were to
form a cooperative ? What if there were say 15 or 20 of them and
they had somewhere to receive and temporarily store the goods,
could they get an account with a timber merchant ? I would think
that they could, but they would have to take advice from the
timber merchant about what species were available and what cross
sections to order. Maybe there would have to be a coop committee
changing regularly. The company that I deal with requires orders
of at least £250 to give me free delivery – they are a national
company. Local merchants will deliver free on reasonable
amounts, but they may not be able to supply the range of species
or cross sections of the bigger companies.
I can see problems that could crop up – the problem of storage,
( a garage would be good enough for a start,) OTT selectivity by
members, and paperwork; but as long as the timber merchant
didn’t have to do more than they normally have to do with their
“Regulars” the price should be very good. Access to the garage
would have to be good enough for an articulated lorry, although
a local merchant may have a smaller option.
A group like this could have valuable
purchasing power and could deal with more than one supplier.
Goodwill would be essential to keep it alive and something like
this could be organised on the Wood-Mag forum. If a group like
this could organise their requirements for standard cross
sections (and it is possible), it would save the members having
to machine them individually. And it could help to answer the
other problem faced by the otherwise placid furniture maker;
“which machines do I need ?”
Sharing machinery and tools might be another benefit of a group
like this but this is an area fraught with problems and might be
an effect of forming such a group rather than a specific goal.
It might be a development of like minded people meeting and
cooperating that a couple of them would keep their costs down by
sharing equipment …. who knows ?
|